Skip to content
Linguistic, Literary, Cultural & Interdisciplinary Studies

Linguistic, Literary, Cultural & Interdisciplinary Studies

Research Lab

Facebook Instagram Linkedin Spotify YouTube
LLCIS@uae.ac.ma
  • Home Page
  • ActivitiesExpand
    • Talks & Lectures
    • Conferences & Symposia
    • Seminars & Workshops
    • Cultural Exchange
    • LAB Students’ Scholarly Activities
    • PhD Laureates
    • Opportunities
  • Journal IssuesExpand
    • Archive Issue
    • Current Issue
  • Editorial BoardExpand
    • Editor-in-Chief & Publication Director
    • Executive Editors
    • Editorial Board
    • Advisory Board
    • Editorial Office
  • AboutExpand
    • About the Journal
    • About the Lab
  • LLCIS TV
This LLCIS Research Lab website provides a backup version of Confluence Journal's official platform hosted and indexed by IMIST-CNRST
Linguistic, Literary, Cultural & Interdisciplinary Studies
Linguistic, Literary, Cultural & Interdisciplinary Studies
Research Lab
Facebook Instagram

Learning in the Age of AI: How AI Is Transforming Adult Learning in Corporate Contexts

Backup copy. This page is kept by the LLCIS Research Laboratory as a backup of Confluence Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. The official version of record is published on the journal’s platform, hosted and indexed by IMIST-CNRST: https://journals.imist.ma/index.php/confluence/article/view/13078.

  • Videhi Bhamidi ORCID
  • Divya Joseph ORCID
  • Maathangi Mohan ORCID
PDF (backup copy)Official version on IMISTDOI
Journal
Confluence Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (e-ISSN 3085-5411)
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): Artificial Intelligence in Education
Section
Articles
Pages
21-37
Published
30 October 2026
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34874/PRSM.cjms-vol2iss4.13078
License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Copyright (c) 2026 Videhi Bhamidi, Divya Joseph, Maathangi Mohan

Abstract

This conceptual scholar-practitioner paper examines how generative AI reshapes the conditions under which adults learn at work. As AI enters everyday knowledge work, learning with AI increasingly happens in the flow of work, raising the question of what is being learned and what is merely performed. Synthesizing andragogy and self-directed learning, sociocultural learning theory, and experiential learning, the paper develops a provisional model of the depth-speed tension across four dimensions of workplace learning, namely learner agency and self-direction, learning through practice and experimentation, social and peer learning, and knowledge in the flow of work. It proposes that AI accelerates access to information and task completion but, under certain conditions, can compress the productive struggle, reflection, and human relationships through which durable skills develop. The moderating conditions, including learner expertise, AI literacy, task complexity, organizational culture, and performance pressure, shape whether AI strengthens or weakens learning. The paper identifies the cognitive and relational work that remains hard to delegate to AI, offers five propositions to guide future empirical testing in workplace settings, and outlines implications for learners, managers, learning professionals, and organizations. Its guiding principle is to get the human learning conditions right before reaching for the technology.

Keywords

Adult LearningDepth-Speed TensionGenerative AIKnowledge WorkSelf-Directed LearningWorkplace Learning

Works Cited (32)
  1. Ackoff, Russell L. “From Data to Wisdom.” Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, vol. 16, 1989, pp. 3-9.
  2. Agustin, Matthew Christian. “AI as a Co-Regulator: Relational Design for Strengthening Self-Regulated Learning.” Frontiers in Education, vol. 11, 2026, article 1761602, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1761602.
  3. Bandura, Albert. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 2, 1977, pp. 191-215, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
  4. Davenport, Thomas H. Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performance and Results from Knowledge Workers. Harvard Business School Press, 2005.
  5. Garrison, D. Randy. “Self-Directed Learning: Toward a Comprehensive Model.” Adult Education Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 1, 1997, pp. 18-33, https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103.
  6. Gottfredson, Conrad, and Bob Mosher. “Are You Meeting All Five Moments of Learning Need?” Learning Guild, 18 June 2012, www.learningguild.com/articles/are-you-meeting-all-five-moments-of-learning-need. Accessed 4 Oct. 2026.
  7. Gourlay, Stephen. “Tacit Knowledge, Tacit Knowing or Behaving?” 3rd European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, 5-6 Apr. 2002, Athens, Greece, warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/conf/olkc/archive/oklc3/id269.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct. 2026.
  8. Jaakkola, Elina. “Designing Conceptual Articles: Four Approaches.” AMS Review, vol. 10, no. 1-2, 2020, pp. 18-26, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0.
  9. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein. “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work: Human-AI Symbiosis in Organizational Decision Making.” Business Horizons, vol. 61, no. 4, 2018, pp. 577-86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007.
  10. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, et al. “Generative AI and the Augmentation of Information Practices in Knowledge Work.” Behaviour & Information Technology, 2025, pp. 1-22, https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2025.2551570.
  11. Kim, Jinhee, et al. “Adult Learners’ Perspectives of AI Applications in Supporting Andragogy.” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 74, no. 4, 2026, pp. 1911-38, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10621-2.
  12. Knowles, Malcolm S. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Revised and updated ed., Cambridge Adult Education, 1980.
  13. Kolb, David A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, 1984.
  14. Lai, Chun, et al. “Learner Agency in Self-Directed Use of GenAI for Informal Language Learning.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 31 Mar. 2026, pp. 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2026.2648781.
  15. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge UP, 1991.
  16. Lee, Hao-Ping (Hank), et al. “The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects from a Survey of Knowledge Workers.” Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Association for Computing Machinery, 2025, pp. 1-22, https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713778.
  17. Lewis, Patrick, et al. “Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, 2020, pp. 9459-74.
  18. Morris, Thomas Howard, et al. “Self-Directed Lifelong Education and Learning in Times of Generative AI.” International Journal of Lifelong Education, vol. 45, no. 2, 2026, pp. 121-26, https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2026.2633668.
  19. Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Hirotaka Takeuchi. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford UP, 1995.
  20. Oliveira, Pedro, et al. “AI Integration in Organisational Workflows: A Case Study on Job Reconfiguration, Efficiency, and Workforce Adaptation.” Information, vol. 16, no. 9, 2025, article 764, https://doi.org/10.3390/info16090764.
  21. Palenski, Ted, et al. “How AI Works: Reconfiguring Lifelong Learning.” Postdigital Science and Education, vol. 6, no. 4, 2024, pp. 1216-39, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00496-y.
  22. Polanyi, Michael. The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday, 1966.
  23. Rausch, Andreas. “Artificial Intelligence for Informal Workplace Learning: A Problem-Solving Perspective.” Frontiers in Organizational Psychology, vol. 3, 2025, article 1555429, https://doi.org/10.3389/forgp.2025.1555429.
  24. Schön, Donald A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, 1983.
  25. Soderstrom, Nicholas C., and Robert A. Bjork. “Learning versus Performance: An Integrative Review.” Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 10, no. 2, 2015, pp. 176-99, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000.
  26. Spiro, Kasper, and Videhi Bhamidi. Employee-Generated Learning: How to Develop Training That Drives Performance. Kogan Page, 2024.
  27. Timmermans, Stefan, and Iddo Tavory. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research: From Grounded Theory to Abductive Analysis.” Sociological Theory, vol. 30, no. 3, 2012, pp. 167-86, https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914.
  28. Vygotsky, Lev S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Edited by Michael Cole et al., Harvard UP, 1978.
  29. Wang, Lei, et al. “A Survey on Large Language Model Based Autonomous Agents.” Frontiers of Computer Science, vol. 18, no. 6, 2024, article 186345, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-40231-1.
  30. Wenger, Etienne. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge UP, 1998.
  31. Whitehead, Alfred North. The Aims of Education and Other Essays. Macmillan, 1929.
  32. Yan, Jitao, et al. “Transforming Organizational Knowledge Creation through Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of the Emergent Literature.” VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, vol. 56, no. 2, 2026, pp. 522-40, https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2024-0296.
Facebook FacebookInstagram InstagramLinkedin LinkedinYouTube YouTubeSpotify Spotify
  • Home Page
  • Activities
  • Journal Issues
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • LLCIS TV

© 2026 Linguistic, Literary, Cultural & Interdisciplinary Studies

Scroll to top
  • Home Page
  • Activities
    • Talks & Lectures
    • Conferences & Symposia
    • Seminars & Workshops
    • Cultural Exchange
    • LAB Students’ Scholarly Activities
    • PhD Laureates
    • Opportunities
  • Journal Issues
    • Archive Issue
    • Current Issue
  • Editorial Board
    • Editor-in-Chief & Publication Director
    • Executive Editors
    • Editorial Board
    • Advisory Board
    • Editorial Office
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Lab
  • LLCIS TV
Search